Thank you. I feel liberated now that I talked about my new obsession.
Okay, I realise that I am blinded by my favouritism and tend to justify Chase's actions even if they are reprehensible, but: Ratting out House to Vogler made perfectly sense from his point of view and while it wasn't a nice thing to do, House didn't really deserve nice treatment at that point. House was playing the fellows off against each other and enjoying it; he was rubbing it in that he was enjoying it; he didn't accept the way out when it presented itself, namely holding the speech. It's okay, because it's perfectly IC for House to torture his fellows and to stand by his principles. But it is also perfectly IC for Chase to not seek open confrontation but rather to act, cunningly and sneakily, but, essentially, successfully. So, it's a matter of personal preference, but I rather like Chase's method.
Heh! I loved Chase eating bagles with tomatoes, as I do it, too.
no subject
Okay, I realise that I am blinded by my favouritism and tend to justify Chase's actions even if they are reprehensible, but: Ratting out House to Vogler made perfectly sense from his point of view and while it wasn't a nice thing to do, House didn't really deserve nice treatment at that point. House was playing the fellows off against each other and enjoying it; he was rubbing it in that he was enjoying it; he didn't accept the way out when it presented itself, namely holding the speech. It's okay, because it's perfectly IC for House to torture his fellows and to stand by his principles. But it is also perfectly IC for Chase to not seek open confrontation but rather to act, cunningly and sneakily, but, essentially, successfully. So, it's a matter of personal preference, but I rather like Chase's method.
Heh! I loved Chase eating bagles with tomatoes, as I do it, too.