donnaimmaculata (
donnaimmaculata) wrote2005-03-08 04:50 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
So now we know what the book covers will look like...
...And already there are "Oh no, poor Snape has been forced by evil Dumbledore to continue teaching Harry!!!11" vibes. But look at it logically: We want Dumbledore to force Snape to continue teaching Harry. Because the books are written from Harry's perspective. If Snape no longer teaches Harry, there will be less Snape in the books.
Unless, of course, one doesn't care for canon!Snape, because Rowling has no grasp of his character anyway.
Unless, of course, one doesn't care for canon!Snape, because Rowling has no grasp of his character anyway.
no subject
And I'm rather tired of the fact that every time someone tries to introduce a new adult character he/she always winds up being the new DADA prof, so I wouldn't mind that pattern broken by giving the job to a familiar character instead!
no subject
I can see JKR's and Dumbledore's explanation that giving Snape the DADA job would be the same as giving an alcoholic the key to the liquor cabinet, though.
I like the new DADA teachers; they're entertaining. But you've got a point about the introduction of new characters vs old faces in general: I, for example, was irritated by the sheer number of new characters who were introduced as Order members and who served no purpose whatsoever. OK, some of them are going to die, but we didn't have to meet them in person for that. I would much rather have seen some established characters more fleshed out; i.e. Bill. - For whom I had great hopes when I learned he came back from Egypt and who disappeared mysteriously after the second half of the book.
Obviously, I am unable to hold a conversation about any HP character without mentioning Bill or Remus at some point.