Date: 2007-01-06 02:25 pm (UTC)
I basically agree with you - especially about Austen - even though I'm for sale when it comes to love at first sight or the whole destined to be-thing. Not because I'm a fan of the deus ex machina solution, but because obsession is interesting. Still, it does, as you say, have to be shown, not said. It's not fun if you're just told that Hero and Heroine loves each other after seeing each other once at the market and therefore wars are fought and empires crushed just so they can meet again and maybe have a burger at McD. I think that's why I hated Harry/Ginny for such a long time. There was nothing but an older boy and the besotted girl. Now that Ginny has begun to become a real person who can interact with Harry as such, I'm willing to give it a shot.

What I miss more is equality. Not necessarily power-wise, but personality-wise. How often have we not read books where the heroine might as well have been exchanged for an animal or a treasure? She's just the reward, not matter how many sassy remarks she can throw off.

To me, an interesting romance is between two persons who can give as good as they get, one way or another. Snape/Harry can easily end like this: "Let me teach you sex, classical music, potions, and more sex while you look at me with wonder in your big child-like eyes and have the childhood you never had, just with sex", but if Harry contributes something as well ("Let me teach you to be a human being"), we're getting somewhere.

But what do I know? I couldn't have a relationship if you paid me to ;)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

donnaimmaculata

September 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 09:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios